today's work

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by Subculture
    No improvement with the leveller bypassed I take it?

    All these things come out of the same jelly mould.
    I tend to agree with you, Andy; seems that the evidence points its bony finger of guilt at the angle-keeper. After this Sunday's deep water run, after this severe c.g.-c.b. change, I still get the wild pitching underwater, I'll swap out the angle keeper with a different unit. Your input always welcome, pal.

    Leave a comment:


  • Subculture
    replied
    No improvement with the leveller bypassed I take it?

    All these things come out of the same jelly mould.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by DrSchmidt
    Did you try turning the leveler feedback down, Dave?
    Yes, went through all three sensitivity settings. No joy.

    Leave a comment:


  • DrSchmidt
    replied
    Did you try turning the leveler feedback down, Dave?

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by redboat219
    I believe this Tom's Chalfant's Type XXIII with your 2.5 SD. No porpoising whatsoever.

    Unfortunately it was lost out on patrol.
    First time I've seen this video. Thanks for sharing. Now, I have hope!

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    I believe this Tom's Chalfant's Type XXIII with your 2.5 SD. No porpoising whatsoever.

    Unfortunately it was lost out on patrol.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by goshawk823

    Hoping this does the trick for you, David. It’s too nice a boat to not run well.
    You bet! This is my third Type-23 from Bronco. Wonderful kit and deserves to run well. It's on me... Mr. 'expert'.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Scan_20240205 (28) - Copy.jpg
Views:	88
Size:	51.4 KB
ID:	188072

    Leave a comment:


  • goshawk823
    replied
    Originally posted by He Who Shall Not Be Named

    I'm all ears, Manfred. I'm completing the re-trim of my Type-23 tonight -- this third change of the boats c.g.-c.b. about seven inches aft of the initial c.g.-c.b. position, which was, when first operated, at the boats longitudinal mid-point. Open water test this Sunday. Film at Eleven, my friend.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2909.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	56.7 KB
ID:	188045
    Hoping this does the trick for you, David. It’s too nice a boat to not run well.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by MFR1964
    David,
    So you're took up the gauntlet to get the XXIII to run good, made a usefull observation at Gangelt Germany, was running my XXIII and during higher speeds she took the plunge to the bottum, steering divingplanes full down, i could see that because it was inside clear water at the swimmingpool, i wonder i it has something to do with the AFD with higher speeds.
    To my surprice the XXI ran great without a ADF, i want to remove the ADF from the XXIII to see if that will give the same results as with the type XXI in handling underwater, i'll report back with the results.

    Manfred.
    I'm all ears, Manfred. I'm completing the re-trim of my Type-23 tonight -- this third change of the boats c.g.-c.b. about seven inches aft of the initial c.g.-c.b. position, which was, when first operated, at the boats longitudinal mid-point. Open water test this Sunday. Film at Eleven, my friend.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2909.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	56.7 KB
ID:	188045

    Leave a comment:


  • MFR1964
    replied
    David,
    So you're took up the gauntlet to get the XXIII to run good, made a usefull observation at Gangelt Germany, was running my XXIII and during higher speeds she took the plunge to the bottum, steering divingplanes full down, i could see that because it was inside clear water at the swimmingpool, i wonder i it has something to do with the AFD with higher speeds.
    To my surprice the XXI ran great without a ADF, i want to remove the ADF from the XXIII to see if that will give the same results as with the type XXI in handling underwater, i'll report back with the results.

    Manfred.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied




























    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by Das Boot
    Ordered mine.
    That's the one. Good stuff.

    Leave a comment:


  • Das Boot
    replied
    Ordered mine.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • biggsgolf
    replied
    David, what sensitivity is the DC set to?

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by Ken_NJ
    David, going back to the XXIII. From after the boat was completed, what problems did you encounter while running the boat and what were your corrective actions? This would be helpful for me and others going forward. Was it weight distribution, foam, dive plane issues, other issues? You mentioned to me at Subfest the CG was just aft of the front of the sail. We got cut short from the weather for me to take a detailed look at the boat.
    Severe pitch oscillations when dived. Initial placement of the c.g. and c.b. was at the hulls mid-point -- as you noted, that put the c.g. and c.b. at the sails leading edge. I then moved the c.g. and c.b. forward four-inches. No joy. This weekend I'm moving the c.g. and c.b. back four-inches aft of the sails leading edge. Film at Eleven.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2913.jpg
Views:	144
Size:	52.3 KB
ID:	187987

    Leave a comment:

Working...