today's work

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • redboat219
    replied
    Remind me of the 1/15 Mk 8 SDV
    https://forum.rc-sub.com/forum/gener...004#post144004.
    Don't remember seeing videos of it running.

    Thr CB will be smaller right?
    Last edited by redboat219; 03-05-2025, 09:43 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by redboat219
    Click image for larger version Name:	Screenshot_20250306_060410_Chrome.jpg Views:	0 Size:	69.3 KB ID:	186617
    Different patterns of vent slots, top is alternating while bottom is in rows.
    stop sweating the small ****. Work first! Rivet counting a distant second!

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot_20250306_060410_Chrome.jpg Views:	0 Size:	69.3 KB ID:	186617
    Different patterns of vent slots, top is alternating while bottom is in rows.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by Albacore 569
    No, the plan by Merriman is a waterline separation unless he changes mind.

    Will see how second print to correct scale is for overall length check. Expected to know this evening. If bang on, then will print other components. A lot of gentle sanding will come next & then priming. Sanding to remove the striation chatter I call it. Normal for this. Others that have contributed to this, big thanks.
    The hull tool will consist of a five-piece rubber tool for the stern (capturing the horizontal and vertical stabilizers in one homogenous hollow resin casting). Like this:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5606.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	42.6 KB
ID:	186604

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5594.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	43.4 KB
ID:	186605

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5600.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	39.2 KB
ID:	186606

    and a three-piece mother-glove tool for the lower hull (one piece) and upper hull (two piece). A bit like this:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5264.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	48.6 KB
ID:	186607

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5315.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	46.5 KB
ID:	186608

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5316.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	49.0 KB
ID:	186609

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5326.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	50.4 KB
ID:	186610

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5333.jpg
Views:	56
Size:	51.4 KB
ID:	186611

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5377.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	55.3 KB
ID:	186613

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5378.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	53.2 KB
ID:	186614

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5385.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	43.7 KB
ID:	186615



















    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Albacore 569
    replied
    In meantime, dabbling with colors. Two schemes seem apparent. A straightforward medium gray waterline up and light green below. Also, a more dazzle like scheme to confuse outline. Anyone know the official colors of Regia Marina camouflage for Italian submarines in WW2? Specifically, the CB's.?

    Adjusted the color emulsion tint and warmth using the skin tones and fortunately an Italian flag also present as a useful convenient shade comparison in photo 2. Color chips my best guess. Ultimately it maybe all jut academic, as I use rostellum colors usually covered with a clear flat as Bob Martin points out is very durable.

    The top photo here amuses me. Midget sub simplicity using the normal background fishing boats to blend in from air reconnaissance. Lol. It works.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	italian-minisommergibile-cb-mar-nero-yalta-1942-midget-submarine.jpg Views:	0 Size:	61.6 KB ID:	186597Click image for larger version  Name:	CB-color.jpg Views:	0 Size:	57.9 KB ID:	186598

    Click image for larger version  Name:	CB-Italian-Midget-Submarines-5.jpg Views:	0 Size:	68.5 KB ID:	186599

    Click image for larger version  Name:	9513178359-701217d280.jpg Views:	0 Size:	64.5 KB ID:	186600


    Click image for larger version  Name:	test-color-2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	22.6 KB ID:	186601

    Click image for larger version  Name:	6291273051-d3401792a1-b-Copy.jpg Views:	0 Size:	55.1 KB ID:	186602
    Last edited by Albacore 569; 03-05-2025, 01:44 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Albacore 569
    replied
    Originally posted by redboat219
    She's a beauty.

    Going with a vertical hull separation?
    No, the plan by Merriman is a waterline separation unless he changes mind.

    Will see how second print to correct scale is for overall length check. Expected to know this evening. If bang on, then will print other components. A lot of gentle sanding will come next & then priming. Sanding to remove the striation chatter I call it. Normal for this. Others that have contributed to this, big thanks.
    Last edited by Albacore 569; 03-05-2025, 12:47 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    She's a beauty.

    Going with a vertical hull separation?
    Last edited by redboat219; 03-05-2025, 07:01 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Albacore 569
    replied
    CB Progressing. First CB Midget sub test. scale off, 3/4 inch too short. Second one adjusted up to 1/32 scale. Overall length will be 18.25 inches (463.55 mm). Print time 16 hours. New one printing now will take 20 hours for these two hull halves.

    Enough detail Davd?

    Click image for larger version  Name:	cb-post-1.jpg Views:	0 Size:	46.5 KB ID:	186593
    Last edited by Albacore 569; 03-04-2025, 10:49 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied

































    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
























    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by redboat219
    Click image for larger version

Name:	CkVKyU.jpg
Views:	156
Size:	68.9 KB
ID:	186522
    Where did you get your reference photos showing the grid patterned holes on top the missile hatches? Click image for larger version

Name:	images (37).jpg
Views:	166
Size:	46.8 KB
ID:	186520 Click image for larger version

Name:	images (35).jpg
Views:	149
Size:	81.4 KB
ID:	186521 I have yet to see photos the actual missile deck with the hatches closed.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	0944.jpg
Views:	151
Size:	53.7 KB
ID:	186523
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250302_005401.jpg
Views:	167
Size:	57.2 KB
ID:	186524 I did however saw a photo of the Type 94 Jin class SSBN, successor to the Xia class showing the holes on top of the missile hatches arranged in a radial pattern.

    What are the chances those on the Type 092 are layed out in a similar pattern?
    Don't know. Went with Trumpeter's interpretation. There are subtle differences (and a few not-so-subtle) between the 092 and 094 class.

    With most projects these days -- with the clock hands ever closer to 12 -- I tend to be less anal retentive, and more pragmatic. Not yet totally useless, but not the sharpe tool I used to be.

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	CkVKyU.jpg
Views:	156
Size:	68.9 KB
ID:	186522
    Where did you get your reference photos showing the grid patterned holes on top the missile hatches? Click image for larger version

Name:	images (37).jpg
Views:	166
Size:	46.8 KB
ID:	186520 Click image for larger version

Name:	images (35).jpg
Views:	149
Size:	81.4 KB
ID:	186521 I have yet to see photos the actual missile deck with the hatches closed.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	0944.jpg
Views:	151
Size:	53.7 KB
ID:	186523
    Click image for larger version

Name:	20250302_005401.jpg
Views:	167
Size:	57.2 KB
ID:	186524 I did however saw a photo of the Type 94 Jin class SSBN, successor to the Xia class showing the holes on top of the missile hatches arranged in a radial pattern.

    What are the chances those on the Type 092 are layed out in a similar pattern?

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by redboat219
    You must be pertaining to the HobbyBoss kit not Trumpeter. 1/350 scale. Click image for larger version

Name:	images (1) (17).jpg
Views:	202
Size:	78.7 KB
ID:	186362 Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20250227_111623_Chrome.jpg
Views:	185
Size:	46.6 KB
ID:	186364 Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20250227_111638_Chrome.jpg
Views:	185
Size:	45.7 KB
ID:	186365 Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20250227_111524_Chrome.jpg
Views:	181
Size:	45.8 KB
ID:	186363
    That's what I get for making an assumption. Yes, you're right: two different kits with different scales. My bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    You must be pertaining to the HobbyBoss kit not Trumpeter. 1/350 scale. Click image for larger version

Name:	images (1) (17).jpg
Views:	202
Size:	78.7 KB
ID:	186362 Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20250227_111623_Chrome.jpg
Views:	185
Size:	46.6 KB
ID:	186364 Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20250227_111638_Chrome.jpg
Views:	185
Size:	45.7 KB
ID:	186365 Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20250227_111524_Chrome.jpg
Views:	181
Size:	45.8 KB
ID:	186363

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by redboat219
    Would have been great if Trumpeter made all the hatches separate pieces for static displays.
    I've seen a Trumpeter test shot of a version of this kit with all missile hatches open.

    Leave a comment:

Working...