today's work

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by goshawk823
    Hey David? Do you have another boat you could drop the Type XXIII cylinder into, just for ****s and grins? Just to see how it behaves in another hull?
    I do. An almost completed 1/96 STURGEON. But, I have many obligations (I'm teaching regularly now) to address so I want to clear those off the table first. Still 'legacy building'. The Type-23 has been banished to upstairs storage, and the cylinder has been post missioned and socked away in the shop 'ready service' pooka under the heavy-duty bench.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	DSCF0460.jpg Views:	0 Size:	46.3 KB ID:	188186

    Click image for larger version  Name:	DSCF6045.jpg Views:	0 Size:	50.3 KB ID:	188187
    Last edited by He Who Shall Not Be Named; 05-27-2025, 06:45 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • MFR1964
    replied
    To my opinion it has to do with the CG and the hydrodynamics of this hull, like Andy stated it's design is made around that, mine only takes the dive at higher speeds, want to take the AFD out, just to see what the result would be.
    Leaving the model alone at this point is a good decision, did the same with the Ko Hyoteki, had to dive her up from the swimmingpool at Germany,, i hate that, for now she will be a static model untill i find working solutions for this model, some things work another things not.

    Manfred.

    Leave a comment:


  • goshawk823
    replied
    Hey David? Do you have another boat you could drop the Type XXIII cylinder into, just for ****s and grins? Just to see how it behaves in another hull?

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by Subculture
    Slots won't make much difference, a little drag but that's all. Moving the the c.g/c.b aft will make the boat less stable, as the c.p is dialled in by the design, and that should always be behind the c.g for stability.

    All these boats are the same, and with the original configuration largely the same as other Type23's, then by deduction the issue must lie with the hydroplane control.
    Agreed, Andy. If I ever revisit this boat, first thing I do is, as you advised, and take the angle-keeper out of the loop.

    Leave a comment:


  • Subculture
    replied
    Slots won't make much difference, a little drag but that's all. Moving the the c.g/c.b aft will make the boat less stable, as the c.p is dialled in by the design, and that should always be behind the c.g for stability.

    All these boats are the same, and with the original configuration largely the same as other Type23's, then by deduction the issue must lie with the hydroplane control.

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    Would be great to have access to a hydrodynamic test facility to test the theory on David's actual boat or the 1/144 scale Type XXIII modified to mimic David's.

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    Originally posted by Ken_NJ
    There were a few running at Subfest that did not seem to have the problem... Just something about your boat perhaps.
    I wonder if the modifications David did to the limber holes on his boat has some effect?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF5315.jpg
Views:	121
Size:	24.2 KB
ID:	188160 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8844.jpg
Views:	112
Size:	18.3 KB
ID:	188159 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8852.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	18.6 KB
ID:	188162 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8853.jpg
Views:	117
Size:	24.2 KB
ID:	188161

    Like the holes in a flute, cover one and the pitch changes.

    Maybe repositioning and changing their size results in some turbulent flow which causes the oscillations

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by Ken_NJ
    Ugh, not something I wanted to hear. Don't know what to think about it except proceed on my XXIII and hope for the best. There were a few running at Subfest that did not seem to have the problem. Steve's I think. Just something about your boat perhaps.
    I'm looking forward to your results. If they are good, then do chronical all pertinent information as to c.g-c.b. placement, amount of fixed ballast weight, etc. I would apply all those conditions to this screaming pile of **** I'm currently burdened with.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by Subculture
    Still got the see-saw effect with the leveller disconnected?
    Didn't try that. If, and when, I ever re-visit this boat I'll try that. Thanks, Andy. Right now I have to distance myself from that project... or someone's gonna get hurt!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ken_NJ
    replied
    Ugh, not something I wanted to hear. Don't know what to think about it except proceed on my XXIII and hope for the best. There were a few running at Subfest that did not seem to have the problem. Steve's I think. Just something about your boat perhaps.

    Leave a comment:


  • Subculture
    replied
    Still got the see-saw effect with the leveller disconnected?

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Tested the Type-23 at the lake yesterday. Terrible results, u/w pitching is the worst yet. This is the third longitudinal change in c.g.-c.b. location on this boat. The hull goes into storage and the WTC will be re-purposed eventually. Total frustration. I don't have a clue as to what I'm doing wrong with this particular hull. Total defeat on this front.

    Leave a comment:


  • Subculture
    replied
    They all tend to operate on the same principles- accelerometer chip linked to a microcontroller, with adjustable gain sometimes continuously variable via a small trim pot or in steps by jumpers or button presses, and finer tweaking via the servo arms.

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    What if you try a different brand like Engels, Microgyros or the old Subtech levellers?
    Last edited by redboat219; 05-22-2025, 09:29 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • biggsgolf
    replied
    Originally posted by He Who Shall Not Be Named

    I tend to agree with you, Andy; seems that the evidence points its bony finger of guilt at the angle-keeper. After this Sunday's deep water run, after this severe c.g.-c.b. change, I still get the wild pitching underwater, I'll swap out the angle keeper with a different unit. Your input always welcome, pal.
    Yup, that's why I asked you what sensitivity it was set to

    Leave a comment:

Working...