today's work

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • goshawk823
    replied
    Originally posted by He Who Shall Not Be Named

















































    Great looking little boat, David. Hope it runs well for you.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied



















































    Leave a comment:


  • MFR1964
    replied
    Got some info about the type XXIII
    Ran her today without the ADF, running low speed no problems, higher speeds works also, but the too late correcting factor is a issue, once she breaks the surface airpockets become a problem.
    Static CG is right in the middle of the tower, added weight around 500 gram, rear and front diveplanes work together on the same channel, no depthkeeper present.

    Manfred.





    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by redboat219

    Going with a 2" dia twin motor wtc?
    Yup..............

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    Originally posted by He Who Shall Not Be Named

    Absolutely, sir. I've kept you waiting too long. Progress pictures to be posted soon.
    Going with a 2" dia twin motor wtc?
    Last edited by redboat219; 05-28-2025, 10:08 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by DrSchmidt
    And the S.M. U-1 ...
    Absolutely, sir. I've kept you waiting too long. Progress pictures to be posted soon.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by Subculture
    MG90s are very worthwhile upgrade over SG90 servos. The difference in price is small, but the MG90s has metal gears with a finer pitch, so they run smooth and are torquier. Same footprint as the SG90, so a straight swap.
    As always, good struff from you side of the Ocean, Andy. Already have a box-full of those. Great minds think alike, pal. Jake had me put those Ironman mini's in his big 1/48 NAUTILUS and they seem to be up to the high loads presented by the propeller pitching mechanism.

    Leave a comment:


  • Subculture
    replied
    MG90s are very worthwhile upgrade over SG90 servos. The difference in price is small, but the MG90s has metal gears with a finer pitch, so they run smooth and are torquier. Same footprint as the SG90, so a straight swap.

    Leave a comment:


  • DrSchmidt
    replied
    And the S.M. U-1 ...

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    Back to the Chinese Type 92 SSBN and Italian CB.

    Leave a comment:


  • goshawk823
    replied
    Originally posted by He Who Shall Not Be Named

    I do. An almost completed 1/96 STURGEON. But, I have many obligations (I'm teaching regularly now) to address so I want to clear those off the table first. Still 'legacy building'. The Type-23 has been banished to upstairs storage, and the cylinder has been post missioned and socked away in the shop 'ready service' pooka under the heavy-duty bench.

    Click image for larger version Name:	DSCF0460.jpg Views:	0 Size:	46.3 KB ID:	188186

    Click image for larger version Name:	DSCF6045.jpg Views:	0 Size:	50.3 KB ID:	188187
    No rest for the wicked. :)

    It’s a beautiful boat and it’s too bad it’s giving you fits for several years.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by Ken_NJ
    Assuming the 'bad' servos are cheap China servos. How many of those are you replacing?
    It varies from source-to-source, about 10-15% failure rate upon initial receipt (I used to buy them in bulk), testing was dynamic with a stall-load. Failure after installation, not so much. Usual point-of-failure was the feed-back potentiometer, which was the case with this unit.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3139.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	39.0 KB
ID:	188197

    Leave a comment:


  • Ken_NJ
    replied
    Assuming the 'bad' servos are cheap China servos. How many of those are you replacing?

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied












    Leave a comment:

Working...