today's work

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • redboat219
    replied
    Mold pattern maker must have gotten confused

    Click image for larger version

Name:	inorout.gif
Views:	168
Size:	17.9 KB
ID:	194397 dimples or bumps

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by Subculture
    I wonder why they put raised detail on the hydroplanes where there are ventilation holes are on the original?
    ****!... I don't know; I'm just the idiot model-kit-assembler here. (I'll fix those little problems after all the structural work is done, I have proper drawings of the original and 'improved' X-Craft).

    Leave a comment:


  • Subculture
    replied
    I wonder why they put raised detail on the hydroplanes where there are ventilation holes are on the original?

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by redboat219
    Happy Easter.

    CA? Why not a cohesive agent?
    Fair question. Though the horizontal stabilizer parts will be subject to most 'collision damage' underway -- and CA adhesive is subject to fracture under shock-loads -- a fusion joint would be the preferred attachment method. However, as there is so much 'footprint' between horizontal stabilizer root and surface of the stern, I figured that a CA bond would be substantial enough to resist breaking as a consequence of being hit by other craft or sides of the pool. And, using CA, eliminated the need on a fusion weld to change state through solvent evaporation... in old age I'm become less tolerant of delay.

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    Happy Easter.

    CA? Why not a cohesive agent?

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied



































    Leave a comment:


  • Das Boot
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Das Boot
    replied
    I built one of these as an Aurora kit, and I remember the little hatch at the top that showed the atomic reactor. How in the name of God, could you build an RC sub this small? What a glutton for punishment, but what a brilliant design. My hats off to you, David.
    Last edited by Das Boot; 04-03-2026, 07:42 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by redboat219
    Will that 1.25" SD fit in the X-craft?
    recommended receiver?
    Yup.

    Lipton-6 or the small Wfly receiver. Any number of small 75-72mHz receivers out there.

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    Will that 1.25" SD fit in the X-craft?
    recommended receiver?

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied














































    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by redboat219
    Just watched your latest youtube video about the 1/230 Skipjack.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JJZ43N.jpg
Views:	140
Size:	74.2 KB
ID:	194367
    what's her static trim?
    How far up is sail submerged when stopped?
    Only a quarter inch of sail projects into the air with proper trim established.

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    Just watched your latest youtube video about the 1/230 Skipjack.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JJZ43N.jpg
Views:	140
Size:	74.2 KB
ID:	194367
    what's her static trim?
    How far up is sail submerged when stopped?
    Last edited by redboat219; 04-03-2026, 05:11 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied


























    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied










    Leave a comment:

Working...