USS Tucson

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SSBN659
    Commander
    • Feb 2009
    • 406

    #61
    Yesterday's work.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8430 copy.jpg
Views:	278
Size:	59.5 KB
ID:	169494

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8432 copy.jpg
Views:	275
Size:	59.3 KB
ID:	169495

    Will Rogers
    SSBN659

    Comment

    • JHapprich
      Captain
      • Oct 2017
      • 720

      #62
      Lovely! Same, though in smaller scale, is next on the list of my beluga build. That LA will be an eye- catcher!

      Jörg

      Comment

      • SSBN659
        Commander
        • Feb 2009
        • 406

        #63
        As I looked back at posts 45. 46 & 57 and CC Clarke's description of the Active Emissions intercept Hydrophones (hope I got the right) convinced me to add that to the model. Working at a scale of 1/113 is a challenge so the hydrophone on the model is just over 1/4 inch high.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8460 copy.jpg
Views:	301
Size:	44.0 KB
ID:	169741

        While researching for my model I found this gem and am now working on the tubes for the fat-line and thin-line arrays.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	Ringed Propeller copy.jpg
Views:	288
Size:	58.1 KB
ID:	169742


        The countermeasures are also in the works.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	Countermeasures .jpg
Views:	285
Size:	49.4 KB
ID:	169743

        Will Rogers
        SSBN659




        Comment

        • SSBN659
          Commander
          • Feb 2009
          • 406

          #64
          I need some help on the countermeasures. These drawings are what I have but trying to shape the front view of the pod is confusing. The after end works well so far but it needs more work.

          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8479 copy.jpg
Views:	294
Size:	48.3 KB
ID:	169822Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8463 crop.jpg
Views:	276
Size:	36.1 KB
ID:	169823

          I searched for pictures of LA class subs on drydock and found these below.

          The first is USS Topeka cropped and edited to get a better look at the pod. The other two photos are similar but I can't recall the names.

          Click image for larger version

Name:	USS Topeka on dock copy.jpg
Views:	241
Size:	53.7 KB
ID:	169826Click image for larger version

Name:	Sub 5 copy.jpg
Views:	244
Size:	49.4 KB
ID:	169827Click image for larger version

Name:	Sub 2 on dock copy.jpg
Views:	236
Size:	58.3 KB
ID:	169828

          Each photo makes it look like the forward end of the pod looks similar to the after end of the pod.

          Can someone with first-hand experience point me in the right direction?

          Will Rogers
          SSBN659
          Attached Files

          Comment

          • He Who Shall Not Be Named
            Moderator
            • Aug 2008
            • 12311

            #65
            Originally posted by SSBN659
            I need some help on the countermeasures. These drawings are what I have but trying to shape the front view of the pod is confusing. The after end works well so far but it needs more work.

            Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_8479 copy.jpg Views:	0 Size:	48.3 KB ID:	169822Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_8463 crop.jpg Views:	0 Size:	36.1 KB ID:	169823

            I searched for pictures of LA class subs on drydock and found these below.

            The first is USS Topeka cropped and edited to get a better look at the pod. The other two photos are similar but I can't recall the names.

            Click image for larger version  Name:	USS Topeka on dock copy.jpg Views:	0 Size:	53.7 KB ID:	169826Click image for larger version  Name:	Sub 5 copy.jpg Views:	0 Size:	49.4 KB ID:	169827Click image for larger version  Name:	Sub 2 on dock copy.jpg Views:	0 Size:	58.3 KB ID:	169828

            Each photo makes it look like the forward end of the pod looks similar to the after end of the pod.

            Can someone with first-hand experience point me in the right direction?

            Will Rogers
            SSBN659
















            Back when Ellie and I were building defense contractor convention model displays we got the job of building three of these things (fairing and canaster) for an outfit I should not mention -- seems the salespeople gave us classified drawings to work from and the Navy went ballistic when they saw the model display at the big Navy League show in DC. We kept our heads down for a good long while after that ****storm. D&E Miniatures never sought or secured a DoD classification ranking, and our customer failed to check that box when they took us on, a third-party, for the display.

            David
            Last edited by He Who Shall Not Be Named; 02-20-2023, 05:32 PM.
            Who is John Galt?

            Comment

            • DrSchmidt
              Captain
              • Apr 2014
              • 922

              #66
              Whats's the ring around the propeller good for? Reduction of vortices? Minimizing vibrations?

              Comment

              • He Who Shall Not Be Named
                Moderator
                • Aug 2008
                • 12311

                #67
                Originally posted by DrSchmidt
                Whats's the ring around the propeller good for? Reduction of vortices? Minimizing vibrations?
                All that I suppose as well as reinforcement against ice damage as these ringed screws were introduced on the later versions of the LA used for ice penetration.









                David​
                Who is John Galt?

                Comment

                • DrSchmidt
                  Captain
                  • Apr 2014
                  • 922

                  #68
                  Another possible reason I could think of is to avoid tnterferece of the porpeller blades with the towed sonar array.

                  Comment

                  • CC Clarke
                    Lieutenant Commander
                    • Aug 2020
                    • 239

                    #69
                    The array tow points are designed to keep the array and tow cable, (3/8" diameter) away from the screw under normal operation. Screws are a lot more expensive than arrays and their replacement can keep a boat sidelined for an extended period.

                    When streamed full scope, the array's tow cable is under a tremdous amount of tension. The easiest way to destroy a tow cable is going from a flank to a backing bell when streamed. The tow cable develops kinks that cannot pass through the hull penetrator on its way to the inboard storage drum just below it, forcing the crew to shear the cable. How does the hole through the pressure hull seal then? The conical entrance in the valve stack uses a 1/2" steel ball that falls into the hole and seals it using outside pressure to keep it centered. Not saying it doesn't drip, but it's better than a through-hole.

                    A fast boat, (USS Olympia, I think) came into Bangor with a constantly leaking tow cable seal. The sonarmen said it had always leaked. Being a SUBSAFE job, I carried a phone-book sized work package back and forth between the various shops for signatures and QA verification when I wasn't on the boat working the job. The valve stack (about 24" high) went to the valve shop for seal replacement and was re-installed aboard the boat and the old tow cable reloaded.

                    The boat returned from sea trials and the CO was ****ed. The seal leaked considerably more than before we worked on it. We off-loaded the cable, and removed the valve stack once more. A more detailed inspection revealed the valve stack was not built to the drawing spec (a machined section was out of tolerance) at Norfolk Naval Shipyard seven years before. Being a SUBSAFE job, this was reported immediately. We remachined the section, reinstalled everything and the seal was properly repaired.

                    The guy who signed the SUBSAFE paperwork off for the valve seven years earlier was not so fortunate- he was fired as soon as they found out he was still working there. I didn't see many people get fired over the years I spent there, but those that were usually had deviated from SUBSAFE requirements. Talk about a work package nightmare!

                    Lesson Learned: There is no Statute of Limitations for SUBSAFE work.​
                    Last edited by CC Clarke; 02-21-2023, 12:12 PM.

                    Comment

                    • wlambing
                      Commander
                      • Nov 2020
                      • 295

                      #70
                      I'm thinking that the valve stack is/was very similar to that on the BRA-24 Floating Wire antenna mechanism. Intimately familiar with that one from my time at NSSF, NLON! I have many stories regarding that little ball, both in-shop and aboard ship. Not all of them fun!!!!

                      Comment

                      • DrSchmidt
                        Captain
                        • Apr 2014
                        • 922

                        #71
                        Thanks, learned something .....

                        Comment

                        • CC Clarke
                          Lieutenant Commander
                          • Aug 2020
                          • 239

                          #72
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	OK-542 Drum-Level Wind Unit.jpg
Views:	212
Size:	50.6 KB
ID:	169885Click image for larger version

Name:	OK-276 System.jpg
Views:	210
Size:	60.4 KB
ID:	169884




                          Originally posted by wlambing
                          I'm thinking that the valve stack is/was very similar to that on the BRA-24 Floating Wire antenna mechanism. Intimately familiar with that one from my time at NSSF, NLON! I have many stories regarding that little ball, both in-shop and aboard ship. Not all of them fun!!!!
                          Probably similar, but with NAVSEA procurement, you never know.

                          These photos of the OK-276 Towed Array Handling System, (two systems per Trident, one for fast boats) show the major components. The Thinline T/A uses a dual sheave drive unit as part of the OK-542 handling system. The thinline array is longer than than the TB-16 Fatline array

                          I went to school for both (NSWC Crane, IN) and many components are shared.

                          The Control Indicator operates the deployment and retraction cycles. It is located within sight of the Storage Drum --since that's the most likely component to tear off limbs.

                          The Cable Drive Unit supplies the force to move the tow cable in either direction.

                          The Storage Drum stows the tow cable. An attached Level Wind Unit ensures the cable wraps are uniform and don't overlap until they reach the edges of the drum. For loading, we would wrap slow and use a 2 x 4 to position the cable manually for extra-tight wraps.

                          The valve stack is positioned directly above the CDU and provides a seal for the tow cable to exit the pressure hull.​

                          For comparison, the BRA-24A system:


                          Click image for larger version

Name:	BRA-24A Floating Wire Handling System.jpg
Views:	226
Size:	43.5 KB
ID:	169883
                          Attached Files

                          Comment

                          • wlambing
                            Commander
                            • Nov 2020
                            • 295

                            #73
                            Oh, great! Even more nightmares relived!!!!!!! ;)

                            Comment

                            • SSBN659
                              Commander
                              • Feb 2009
                              • 406

                              #74
                              Really appreciate all the help I'm getting from you submariners. Thanks.

                              Will Rogers
                              SSBN659

                              Comment

                              • SSBN659
                                Commander
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 406

                                #75
                                I'm still trying to get the countermeasures right. Recall my first attempt in the first picture below. It was nowhere near what it should be so back to work. After trying several different materials I'm on attempt number 6 now using a pink material I found that is similar to Reshape and easy to sand. Picture 2 shows several throwaways. Each attempt is glued to my plastic Ace card for shaping on the sander. When one side is finished I reverse the piece on the card to shape the other side. When I finally get a piece I'm satisfied with it will become the master to mold 2 identical pieces. More to come.

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8463 crop.jpg
Views:	200
Size:	36.1 KB
ID:	169924 Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8493 copy.jpg
Views:	192
Size:	52.2 KB
ID:	169925Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8490 copy.jpg
Views:	179
Size:	49.5 KB
ID:	169926Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8496 copy.jpg
Views:	184
Size:	52.2 KB
ID:	169927Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8498 copy.jpg
Views:	192
Size:	39.5 KB
ID:	169928

                                Will Rogers
                                SSBN659

                                Comment

                                Working...