Unless your skydiver requires the jets to sit above the waterline then I don't see the advantage in a waterjet over a normal ducted prop arrangement. After all waterjets are optimised for sucking up water and squirting it out the back into air. Something that doesn't happen very much on a sub!
Stingray Build
Collapse
X
-
-
True, but as model builders, most of us will try anything at least once.IT TAKES GREAT INTELLIGENCE TO FAKE SUCH STUPIDITY!Comment
-
As I understand it, A water jet works best when the jet is pushing against air, Not so efficent Under water. After testing the smaller stingray with a Graupner Mini jet and Seeing it go under water and then shoot up again I dont think the power loss was that bad (But im not an expert) Its about half the push, Then again Do I want to be doing Rate 6 under water, lol.
Right, The Graupner 40mm jet will not fit the Stingray and allow you to install a Big enough WTC. So I have gone with the Kehere 28mm jet. It will be powered By a brushless motor same as Skydiver. I'm Looking at this one as a kind of Test bed, when David has done his stuff I'll hopefully do another. I have thought of a way to make the ratemaster spin and I'm reasonably confident it will work. The jet has been installed in the conventional way as it was in a pretty poor state (Having been ripped out of another model, Skydiver) the other will be winging its way to the US in a couple of days. I will take pictures tommorow and post.Comment
-
As I understand it, A water jet works best when the jet is pushing against air, Not so efficent Under water. After testing the smaller stingray with a Graupner Mini jet and Seeing it go under water and then shoot up again I dont think the power loss was that bad (But im not an expert) Its about half the push, Then again Do I want to be doing Rate 6 under water, lol.
Right, The Graupner 40mm jet will not fit the Stingray and allow you to install a Big enough WTC. So I have gone with the Kehere 28mm jet. It will be powered By a brushless motor same as Skydiver. I'm Looking at this one as a kind of Test bed, when David has done his stuff I'll hopefully do another. I have thought of a way to make the ratemaster spin and I'm reasonably confident it will work. The jet has been installed in the conventional way as it was in a pretty poor state (Having been ripped out of another model, Skydiver) the other will be winging its way to the US in a couple of days. I will take pictures tommorow and post.
DavidWho is John Galt?Comment
-
The point I was trying to get across is that for a boat with submerged propulsors you don't need the space hogging scoops used in waterjets. If you cut the front half off a waterjet you have a shrouded prop with some fixed pre-swirl stators. If you're running a boat on the surface with the impellors above the waterline, then clearly you have got to have scoops, else they will never get to see any water!Comment
-
The point I was trying to get across is that for a boat with submerged propulsors you don't need the space hogging scoops used in waterjets. If you cut the front half off a waterjet you have a shrouded prop with some fixed pre-swirl stators. If you're running a boat on the surface with the impellors above the waterline, then clearly you have got to have scoops, else they will never get to see any water!Comment
-
Ah!... you sneaky so-and-so: your going to put some vanes on the inside of the RatMaster that will act as turbine blades to set the door-knob in motion when impinged on by the PJ flow. You're amazing, sir.
DavidWho is John Galt?Comment
-
-
Comment