Japanese Sen Toku I-401 Submarine Build

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sinksalot
    replied
    I use two 750ml piston tanks in my Engel type IX sub. God is that sub stable in the water. it can hover at depth, just sit there, but it gets boring after a while with your sub not moving. If i could I do the same system in my I-400 I would. Bob is suppose to have his own WTCs out soon. But that maybe delay as he has to go under the knife again. You could buy a OTW WTC and use that WTC in a few subs that are the same size to save money as OTW WTCs cost over $1000. I may do that. Use one OTW WTC for my I-400 and a XXI, both 3D printed,

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Victory
    replied
    I remember Mr. Bob Martin talking about his 1/32 XXI U-boat project in one of his youtube broadcasts (I forget the scale, it might be this scale), he used two ballast water tanks, one placed in front and one behind. Then someone asked why not use two piston tanks, Bob's explanation was similar to what I said, the piston tanks take up too much space and are too complicated, but that doesn't mean they don't work, it's just that the gas system is still better when applied to a situation like a WWII submarine. engel's rc submarines have always used piston ballast systems, no matter what submarine it is. It's their tradition and their patent, and they won't change it easily.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sinksalot
    replied
    Yea the one IJN sub I bought has that same system. Most likely made by the same person.


    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3677.jpg Views:	0 Size:	57.4 KB ID:	155610

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    Wat_air is currently converting a 1/350 I-400 to RC. If he can do it in 1/350 scale you can do in something that is twice bigger.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Victory
    replied
    Originally posted by redboat219
    Dual piston
    I've seen this video before and yes, it's interesting. The rc subs in the video are basically small, like 1/150 VII, 1/350 I-400, 1/200 IXC...etc. I forget if he uses a servo or something else to push the piston. The 1/72 I-400 was 179cm long, bigger than Engel's 1/100 Typhoon. WWII submarines always have a high freeboard, so I think a gas system (like SAS) is the best choice, simple, takes up less space, saves power, and allows the sub to break the surface tension of the water to come up to the correct waterline position. What you need to consider a bit more might be a very powerful diaphragm pump, like this one, with two pairs of air ports and drived by a brushless motor,very powerful.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	捕获.JPG
Views:	278
Size:	17.7 KB
ID:	155602
    One piston tank takes up a lot of space, not to mention two, and the real I-400 sub does not have a very good diving effect because it has a very small pair of bow planes.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	blog_import_5d64b38311b73.jpeg
Views:	232
Size:	46.3 KB
ID:	155603

    Unlike the common 90-degree front planes retraction, the I-400's are 180-degree retraction, so for RC, it can be retracted by using a rack-and-pinion structure.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Bowplane retract.jpg
Views:	236
Size:	84.2 KB
ID:	155604

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    Originally posted by Sinksalot

    Are those the piston tanks that use the lipstick case to push the piston in at out? If so, I always thought that was a great idea.
    Wife: Honey, have you seen my L'Oréal Colour Riche Original Satin lipstick?
    You: Nope.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sinksalot
    replied
    Originally posted by redboat219
    Dual piston
    Are those the piston tanks that use the lipstick case to push the piston in at out? If so, I always thought that was a great idea.

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    Dual piston

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    The Maru yu used dual piston tanks for diving and pitch control, dive planes are fixed. Only moving control surface is the rudder.

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    Maybe you could try the components used onboard this 1/100 IJN Maru Yu transport sub with your I-400.

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    39 inches equates to 1/123rd scale.

    "It's impossible, but doable." - Robert MacDougall (Sean Connery) Entrapment.
    Last edited by redboat219; 11-08-2021, 09:30 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • rwtdiver
    replied
    I have re-sized my i-401 to a more manageable size!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Smaller i-401.jpg
Views:	322
Size:	78.5 KB
ID:	155579Click image for larger version

Name:	Smaller i-401 2.jpg
Views:	315
Size:	79.6 KB
ID:	155580

    It will work out to about 39" in length! I have all the bottom sections printed out, and I have a good start on the upper hull! Do to the size reduction, I am not sure if I can configure the stern section to accommodate rudder and stern dive planes linkage for full operation!

    This may just turn out to be a static model! I will know more after I start into the actual build construction!

    Rob
    "Firemen can stand the heat"

    Leave a comment:


  • cheapsub
    replied
    Full size 122M X 12M

    1:96. 1.27M / 4.17ft long

    Just a bit bigger than World War II Fletcher class destroyer

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    How big would it be at 1/96 scale?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sinksalot
    replied
    Almost forgot this is a 1/125 test print of my I-400 design. I printed it to find errors in the design.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1863.JPG
Views:	256
Size:	66.7 KB
ID:	155334

    Leave a comment:

Working...