Skipjack 1/72

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by trout
    Excellent application! I use the Aluminum (Aluminum for Mike) metal powder on the masts. Thank you. I love this site!
    Speaking of alummminnuuunium powder ... Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF2438.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	88.3 KB
ID:	93401 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF2444.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	88.7 KB
ID:	93402

    (I love this site too, and would say so, but Mike is such a prick when it comes to complements)

    M

    Leave a comment:


  • trout
    replied
    Excellent application! I use the Aluminum (Aluminium for Mike) metal powder on the masts. Thank you. I love this site!
    Last edited by trout; 02-17-2015, 09:52 PM. Reason: Stupid spell check fixed my joke, which of course makes it not funny

    Leave a comment:


  • greenman407
    replied
    Originally posted by He Who Shall Not Be Named
    Thanks Dave, I just ordered me one of dem dare foil sheets

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by trout
    What is that you are using for the MBTV?
    Bare-Metal-Foil. A self-adhesive thin aluminum foil developed for the model car guys who want that 'shine' of Chrome.



    M

    Leave a comment:


  • trout
    replied
    What is that you are using for the MBTV?

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Nice job on the paint job so far, Mark. Try this trick for the MBTV's:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0123.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	78.9 KB
ID:	93395 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0127 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	92.5 KB
ID:	93396 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0128.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	93.2 KB
ID:	93397 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0129.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	86.2 KB
ID:	93398 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0130_0001.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	87.2 KB
ID:	93399

    Leave a comment:


  • greenman407
    replied
    Today I got the sonar dome squirted Charcoal Grey. Then I need to do the International Orange on the Buoys and the silver on the vents. Then LEDs in the sail.Click image for larger version

Name:	003.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	89.3 KB
ID:	93384Click image for larger version

Name:	015.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	80.5 KB
ID:	93385Click image for larger version

Name:	017.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	79.2 KB
ID:	93386
    Last edited by greenman407; 02-15-2015, 09:15 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • greenman407
    replied
    Oh, Gotcha. Bonappetite! (spelling)

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by greenman407
    Two things
    (1) Your just playing with me.
    (2) A wet hulled submarine gets very heavy once submerged. By adding foam at the waterline to achieve neutral buoyancy, you have negated the extra weight that you have added in the keel by displacing some of the water(and its weight) that is up higher. The end result is the same except you now have more weight lower in the hull for more stability. You still flood the ballast tank (submerge) with 1/2" to 1" of the sail sticking out of the water. So then, whats the DANGER in that?
    You have it right -- the objective is to increase the mass to increase the force of gravity, and to cram in enough displacing foam to produce a buoyant force that cancels the increased gravity force. Center of gravity low, center of buoyancy high produces a taller metacentric height, which is the moment arm that rights the sub statically about the roll (and to a much lesser degree) pitch axis when the c.g and c.b. are displaced from their proper vertical orientation to one another. The vehicle is statically stable when the c.g is directly under the c.b. Anything else, a moment is produced to put the c.g. and c.b. back into vertical alignment.

    (The glug, glug sounds was me oinking down those Diet Mountain Dew's you sent me -- the source of confusion I bet).

    M

    Leave a comment:


  • greenman407
    replied
    Two things
    (1) Your just playing with me.
    (2) A wet hulled submarine gets very heavy once submerged. By adding foam at the waterline to achieve neutral buoyancy, you have negated the extra weight that you have added in the keel by displacing some of the water(and its weight) that is up higher. The end result is the same except you now have more weight lower in the hull for more stability. You still flood the ballast tank (submerge) with 1/2" to 1" of the sail sticking out of the water. So then, whats the DANGER in that?

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Glug, glug ... er ... right you are, Mark. Glug, glug.

    M

    Leave a comment:


  • greenman407
    replied
    To help this boat take advantage of the upgraded motor install, I am adding more weight to the keel. It can only help keep it from rolling during power application. Since you have to add corresponding foam to the boat to achieve neutral buoyancy, the added weight wont cause additional drag. But, it will increase stability. Right Dave?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	006.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	91.0 KB
ID:	93346

    Leave a comment:


  • greenman407
    replied
    I finished the sanding on the BooBoo. Now to restore the scum line that runs thru it. Ive got a stainless straight edge with sandpaper glued to the bottom of it to help it "stick" where I put it during the scribing process. Its been my experience that when you try to scribe thru Evercoat or Bondo ,the scribing tool chips the softer filler material and you have a bad scribe job. So I did two things to help prevent that. One....I coated the area with thin CA and let it soak in. Then sanded it down. I also used a razor saws tip end to do the scribing by placing the saw at a low angle to the work and pulling the saw backwards along the edge of the straight edge positioned along the scum line. It worked perfect. No chipped edges. I installed some decals to the rudder, but its too cold tonight to apply any paint. Ill probably have to wait until next weekend. We are getting closer.

    Leave a comment:


  • greenman407
    replied
    I did a little more sanding today. Ill be putting another coat of black on it next weekend.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	009.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	95.3 KB
ID:	93241Click image for larger version

Name:	010.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	93.6 KB
ID:	93242Click image for larger version

Name:	011.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	96.9 KB
ID:	93243

    Leave a comment:


  • greenman407
    replied
    I beg to report my meager progress since my last posting. As you will recall, the red that I painted on the lower section "crazed" and I made numerous attempts at wet sanding and repainting. When you wet sand you dull the paint. Since I did this several times, I reached the point of sanding only the offending areas. This left bright shiny paint in some areas and dull ,flat paint in others. So I sprayed all the red on the lower hull with clear gloss polyurethane to even out the finish. After more than enough drying time has elapsed, I will then spray it with the same product manfacturer, except this time a clear satin to tone it down.
    At the same time I got in some sanding on the dreaded upper hulls center seam debacle that I reported last week.

    Leave a comment:

Working...