Assembling the Arkmodel 1/72 KILO kits ... that's right: kits!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Yeah ... Peter ... you do that.

    M

    Leave a comment:


  • greenman407
    replied
    Peter, YOU could ask him again in a couple of weeks. Let me know how that works out for you. HA!

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by Peter W
    Pity and a shame...

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]30485[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]30486[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]30487[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]30488[/ATTACH]


    I suppose a regular one is OK.....sigh


    [ATTACH=CONFIG]30489[/ATTACH]

    Let me know about the plans though Mr. M

    Peter


    P.S. Thanks for the support Mark ! ........Running away!

    I so love it when the troops start throwing each other under the bus!

    Nice pictures.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0013 (3).jpg
Views:	2
Size:	95.5 KB
ID:	97787 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0018.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	91.4 KB
ID:	97788 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0197.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	82.5 KB
ID:	97789 Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0199.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	89.3 KB
ID:	97790 I already made a Project-636 propeller in 1/144 for the TRUMPTER kit. Now I gotta do it again for Feng's kit. Grrrrr!



    M
    Last edited by He Who Shall Not Be Named; 03-18-2015, 08:54 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • reddevil
    replied
    Do you think ARKMODEL is a reliable supplier? Cause some people (not me; I've lerarned a little) have had the same bad experience with him with than with Mr. Palumbo.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter W
    replied
    Pity and a shame...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	alrosa 3.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	91.3 KB
ID:	97773Click image for larger version

Name:	alrosa 4.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	83.7 KB
ID:	97774
    Click image for larger version

Name:	kilo 93.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	98.4 KB
ID:	97775Click image for larger version

Name:	kilo 94.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	43.7 KB
ID:	97776


    I suppose a regular one is OK.....sigh


    Click image for larger version

Name:	kilo 4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	96.0 KB
ID:	97777

    Let me know about the plans though Mr. M

    Peter


    P.S. Thanks for the support Mark ! ........Running away!

    Leave a comment:


  • greenman407
    replied
    Originally posted by He Who Shall Not Be Named
    No. Sorry for the confusion, Mark. The model pictured with the many stator blades is the OTW 1/100 VANGUARD I assembled for a customer -- I manufactured a new sail, control surfaces and pump-jet. Those enhancements were reduced to tooling I sent to OTW to up-grade their kit. Pushy *******, ain't I?!

    The pictures presented only to further demonstrate the use of metal straps to hold parts till they can be permanently bonded in place.

    Nooooo, I will not convert to the ALROSA. You nut! I'm assembling these kits stock (other than making a proper propeller). No, Caswell, as far as I know is not marketing these kits. But, to be sure, check with Mike directly on that, Mark.

    M
    AH Well its was PETERS fault......Not Mine...................HE WAS THE ONE who suggested it......right peter?(as im slinking away to my corner)

    Leave a comment:


  • HardRock
    replied
    I have one of these kits available in Sydney if Mr C is out of stock. Purchased it two years ago and I don't look close to getting it done (wrong scale for me as well). At cost plus postage.

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by greenman407
    I must have mis-understood. I thought that these pictures of the pump jet(above attached)....(and pictured below) were part of the Kilo kit.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]30482[/ATTACH]
    No. Sorry for the confusion, Mark. The model pictured with the many stator blades is the OTW 1/100 VANGUARD I assembled for a customer -- I manufactured a new sail, control surfaces and pump-jet. Those enhancements were reduced to tooling I sent to OTW to up-grade their kit. Pushy *******, ain't I?!

    The pictures presented only to further demonstrate the use of metal straps to hold parts till they can be permanently bonded in place.

    Nooooo, I will not convert to the ALROSA. You nut! I'm assembling these kits stock (other than making a proper propeller). No, Caswell, as far as I know is not marketing these kits. But, to be sure, check with Mike directly on that, Mark.

    M

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter W
    replied
    Mr. M did the kit come with plans? I do have a set of plans for an 877 if you need them, I also have some good drydock reference shots if required.

    Peter

    Leave a comment:


  • greenman407
    replied
    Originally posted by He Who Shall Not Be Named
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]30370[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]30371[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]30372[/ATTACH] Yes, very useful when you have to hold assemblies together as you affix GRP re-enforcement on the inside. Here is another example of using brass straps to hold sub-assemblies together before bonding them permanently.
    I must have mis-understood. I thought that these pictures of the pump jet(above attached)....(and pictured below) were part of the Kilo kit.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN0159.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	83.3 KB
ID:	97770
    Last edited by greenman407; 03-17-2015, 03:43 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • greenman407
    replied
    YES,YES.............I vote for the Alrosa. So your saying that Caswell will not be a supplier?

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by redboat219
    Like a multistage turbine. But water has a low compressibilty, wouldn't that cause problems?
    Water is, for all intents and purposes, un-compressible.

    David

    Leave a comment:


  • redboat219
    replied
    Originally posted by He Who Shall Not Be Named
    leaves me wondering if there were multiple rotor-stator stages in that tunnel looking shroud.

    M
    Like a multistage turbine. But water has a low compressibilty, wouldn't that cause problems?

    Leave a comment:


  • He Who Shall Not Be Named
    replied
    Originally posted by Peter W
    lovely looking kit, bit anal with the bags though. If you are having to make new props why not go whole hog and build the Alrosa ?


    Look at all that green stuff, you'd love it.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]30479[/ATTACH]

    Peter
    Yeah, they went nuts with the bags. A good thing: better too much packaging than too little!

    I have never seen a pump-jet with such a high inlet/nozzle area ratio! WTF is going on in there? I've seen yard pictures with a rotor and stator, but that only leves me wondering if there were multiple rotor-stator stages in that tunnel looking shroud. It appears to be the later Project-636 desgin of the KILO, but kept in national service -- not exported. Or ... so I've read.

    Good catch. NASTY! Just the way I like 'em.

    Stop tempting me with this neat **** -- I'm falling behind again!!!!

    Oh, here's a video of a Trumpeter 1/144 KILO kit at the pool for you:





    M
    Last edited by He Who Shall Not Be Named; 03-17-2015, 10:16 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter W
    replied
    lovely looking kit, bit anal with the bags though. If you are having to make new props why not go whole hog and build the Alrosa ?


    Look at all that green stuff, you'd love it.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Kilo 9.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	75.7 KB
ID:	97767

    Peter

    Leave a comment:

Working...