Still researching this, but certainly something we need to keep aprised of intently:
Link to FCC Ruling
Summary
Bottom line (plain English)
The FCC action you’re hearing about is UAS-specific and radio-authorization-specific.
It does not create a general ban on motors, batteries, ESCs, controllers, or other electronics used in RC submarines unless those items themselves contain radio transmitters that require FCC certification and are explicitly marketed as UAS (drone) components.
What is not covered
The FCC does not regulate:
unless those items contain an intentional radio transmitter.
There is no FCC authority to ban:
Those components fall outside FCC jurisdiction entirely.
How this applies to RC submarines (your actual concern)
✅ Batteries
This was already true before the drone situation:
If you are already using:
…nothing has changed unless:
Most RC submarine radios are not marketed or classified as UAS equipment, even if drones also use them.
Link to FCC Ruling
Summary
| DJI Ban | NDAA-triggered federal restriction if no security audit by deadline | Trigger passed → restriction in effect |
| FCC UAS Critical Components Rule | Broader FCC policy adding foreign drones and key parts to Covered List | Now in effect |
| Effect on Hobby Flying | Existing drones okay; new imports blocked | Yes, new imports blocked |
| Effect on Components (controller, motors, batteries) | Treated same as drones | Blocked for new imports |
The FCC action you’re hearing about is UAS-specific and radio-authorization-specific.
It does not create a general ban on motors, batteries, ESCs, controllers, or other electronics used in RC submarines unless those items themselves contain radio transmitters that require FCC certification and are explicitly marketed as UAS (drone) components.
What is not covered
The FCC does not regulate:
- Motors
- Batteries
- ESCs
- Power distribution boards
- Non-RF controllers
- Sensors
- Pressure systems
- Submerged or tethered systems
unless those items contain an intentional radio transmitter.
There is no FCC authority to ban:
- A brushless motor
- A LiPo battery
- A generic microcontroller
- A CAN, PWM, UART, or I²C device
Those components fall outside FCC jurisdiction entirely.
How this applies to RC submarines (your actual concern)
✅ Batteries
- Not regulated by FCC
- No issue importing, selling, or using them
- Drone headlines are irrelevant here
- Not regulated by FCC
- Treated the same whether used in drones, boats, cars, or subs
This was already true before the drone situation:
- Any receiver, transmitter, telemetry module, or modem must:
- Have FCC authorization or
- Be imported under an existing compliance pathway (Part 15, Part 95, experimental, etc.)
If you are already using:
- FrSky
- ELRS
- Crossfire
- 900 MHz / 2.4 GHz / 433 MHz systems
…nothing has changed unless:
- The device is newly seeking FCC authorization, and
- It is explicitly marketed as a UAS/drone radio system, and
- The manufacturer is on the Covered List
Most RC submarine radios are not marketed or classified as UAS equipment, even if drones also use them.

Comment