Here's the historical drawing I had started with, to draw up my own blueprints ... and testing some theories as I went, using a "half model" ... eventually ending up with the static model seen above.

... and here is a tracing that someone made, of that official drawing. For several reasons I'll explain later, in some detail (in both words and via pictures), I felt the "several decades after the fact" tracing below was considerably less reliable than the original drawing, above.
Basically, I noted that this drawing below existed, and I did study it (along with anything else I found) ... but when it came time to get serious about figuring out the proportions, outlines, and contours of the "real thing" I immediately went back to the image, above.

These two drawings, plus some very interesting text accounts, I had sourced from an official U.S. Navy historical web site ... so they're as "official" a pair of drawings as anyone is likely to run across. And given that the first one was drawn by an eyewitness, who saw the real thing OUT of the water, while it was being reconstructed in dry dock ... well, to me, considering how "iffy" most of the other, later artist's takes on this thing generally seemed to be ... well, while I eagerly studied any contemporary (or later) drawings I could find, I kept coming back to that first drawing; over and over and over. When the initial "study all the images you can find" period ended, I used that drawing almost exclusively; as I felt virtually everything else was just too prone to guesswork and "making things up". Anyway ... more on the analysis phase, in just a bit!








Leave a comment: